Fliff Inc. Review: Platforms and Lawsuits

  • Martin Vatev

    The author of this page

  • Last Updated:

Fliff Inc. burst onto the scene back in 2018 when Matthew Ricci and Mario Dodev decided to shake up the social gaming world.

Based out of King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (with their main digs at 1150 First Avenue, Suite 501), this Delaware-registered company operates completely above board – they've even got their trademark locked down (Registration Number 6325193).

Here's what's interesting: Ricci serves as CEO while both founders retain ownership, and they've attracted serious money from venture capital heavyweights.

We're talking Courtside Ventures, Acies Investments, The Raine Group – these don't throw cash around lightly. Fliff Inc. raised a $15 million Series B funding round in August 2022.

The company runs its own interactive multiplayer platform that bridges free-to-play and real money betting models. Their development team spans from Pennsylvania to Sofia, Bulgaria, where they handle software and gaming platform development.

Fliff Inc. operates two social casinos: Fliff and Sidepot. Their main sports betting app Fliff was involved in a class action lawsuit in California in 2023.

Fliff Inc. company info

Check out this breakdown of everything you'd want to know about Fliff Inc. as a company.

Detail Information
Company Fliff, Inc.
Owner(s) Matthew Ricci and Mario Dodev
Primary Offices (Locations) Main office: 1150 First Avenue, Suite 501, King of Prussia, PA 19406
Mailing address: 100 S Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19110-9997
Licenses Operates under sweepstakes law rather than direct betting licenses
Number of Employees Between 51–200 (approximately 125)
Estimated Annual Revenue ~$19.8 million
Social Casinos / Products Fliff (primary social sports gaming platform); Sidepot (social casino)

What are the Fliff Inc. casinos?

Fliff Inc. owns and operates two distinct sweepstakes platforms: Fliff and Sidepot.

Fliff

Launched in 2019, Fliff revolutionized social sports betting with its dual-currency system (Fliff Coins and Fliff Cash). You're getting access to 9 sports categories – NFL, NCAA football, NBA basketball, soccer, MMA, boxing and tennis action.

The platform's in-house development keeps everything betting odds competitive, and they've built iOS and Android apps rated 4.8 and 4.6 respectively.

Operating legally across most US states, Fliff lets you redeem prizes starting at $50 through bank transfers or Skrill.

fliff inc website landing

Sidepot

Sidepot, launched in 2024 by Fliff Inc., offers a sweepstakes experience with a broad game library and modern features.

The social casino site includes 906 slots, featuring titles like Sugar Rush and Bonanza Billion, along with 50 table games and a set of exclusive games under the Sidepot Originals label, including Crash and Dice.

The other games are provided by BGaming, Pragmatic Play, NetGaming and 9 additional studios, offering a mix of high-volatility and casual options.

Redemptions require a $100 minimum for cashouts. Sidepot sweeps casino supports both traditional payment methods and cryptocurrency, including Bitcoin, Ethereum and USDT.

sidepot fliff inc.

Fliff Inc. lawsuits

Fliff Inc. faced legal heat in June 2023 when Bishoy Nessim and other plaintiffs filed a class action lawsuit in California.

The core issue? They claimed Fliff runs an illegal sportsbook by letting California residents place real money bets disguised as "Fliff Cash" wagers.

The plaintiffs argue this violates California's gambling laws and the state's Unfair Competition Law (Cal Bus & Prof Code § 17200). They're seeking between $5 million and $7 million in damages and restitution.

The complaint specifically targets Fliff's "free to play" advertising, saying it's misleading since users deposit real money for Fliff Cash that functions like actual betting currency.

Here's where it gets interesting: the complaint alleges violations of both state and federal law, including the Wire Act.

A federal judge sent the case to arbitration based on Fliff's terms of use – denying the plaintiffs' request for a temporary restraining order to pause arbitration.

Nessim dropped the proposed class action certification, though individual arbitration claims continue.